- Museum for Architectural Drawing, Berlin
- Make models: 20 Ropemaker Street, part 2
- The value of the drawing
- Balance
- Interview with Lendlease’s Natalie Slessor
- Draw to Make
- Interview with Brookfield Properties’ Stuart Harman
- Drawing details – technical and poetic
- Betts Project
- Music and the workplace
- Combatting loneliness in the built environment
- Wellbeing and the workplace
- Interview with Brookfield Properties’ Peter Clarke
- An update from Sydney
- Make models: 20 Ropemaker Street, part 3
- Sydney born and razed
- Interview with Argent’s Nick Searl
- Make models: 20 Ropemaker Street, part 1
- The smart workplace
- Interview with General Projects’ Jacob Loftus
- Interview with Chinachem’s Donald Choi
- Make’s past, present and future
- The Architecture Drawing Prize – Not just another competition
- Leaving a mark
- Community connections
- My time with the BCO
- The call of the wild
- Long live the office
- The art of an art historian
- Mary, queen of hotels
- Make models: Portsoken Pavilion
- The Make Charter
- Why Brexit will see a glass half-full emptied
- Make models: LSQ London
- Disappearing Here – On perspective and other kinds of space
- Drawing and thinking
- Drawing to an end?
- Making shops exciting again: Lessons from the Nordics (part 1)
- Make models: Grosvenor Waterside
- Drawing architecture
- The Hollow Man: poetry of drawing
- Above and beyond
- Interview with Lendlease’s Kevin Chapman
- Making shops exciting again: Lessons from the Nordics (part 2)
- Plein air in the digital age
- A “Plan in Impossible Perspective”
- Art Editor’s picks
- Making shops exciting again: Lessons from the Nordics (part 3)
- The future of bespoke HQs
- Make models: The Luna
- World-class architecture
- The Architecture Drawing Prize exhibition review
- The future is bright but not the same
- Employee ownership
- The tools of drawing
- Trecento re-enactment
- Lessons on future office design from Asia Pacific
- The human office
- How drawing made architecture
- Advocating sustainable facade design
- Make models: FC Barcelona’s Nou Palau Blaugrana
- Drawing as an architect’s tool
- Are you VReady?
- Cycle design for the workplace
- The Architecture Drawing Prize
- Make models: an urban rail station
- Reporting from Berlin
- City-making and Sadiq
- Hand-drawing, the digital (and the archive)
- Ken Shuttleworth on drawing
- The green tiger
- Stefan Davidovici – green Mars architect
- When drawing becomes architecture
- Make models: Swindon Museum and Art Gallery
- The role of the concept sketch
- Make calls for a cultural shift in industry’s approach to fire safety
- 2036: A floor space odyssey
- Harold on tour
- London refocused
- Hotels by Make
- Full court press
- Digital Danube
- Don’t take a pop at POPS
- The future of architecture – Matthew Bugg
- The future of architecture – Jet Chu
- The future of architecture – Robert Lunn
- The future of architecture – David Patterson
- The future of architecture – Rebecca Woffenden
- The future of architecture – Katy Ghahremani
- Safer streets for all
- The importance of post-occupancy evaluation for our future built environment
- Put a lid on it
- Designing for a liveable city
- The future of architecture – Bill Webb
- Bricks – not just for house builders
- Designing in the City of Westminster
- Rolled gold
- How to make a fine suit
- Responsible sourcing starts with design
- Is off-site manufacture the answer?
- Developing a design for the facade of 7-10 Hanover Square
- Curious Sir Christopher Wren
- Responsible resourcing should be an integral part of every project
- The socio-economic value of people-focused cities
As much as possible, I try to be a glass-half-full kind of person. I agree with testing new ideas, with pushing boundaries, with taking risks. I like to see how things can be done differently. I don’t think things should stay the same just because we’re comfortable with it. I don’t necessarily agree with the adage ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’, because nine times out of ten, things can be improved.
I did my best to apply the same thinking to Brexit. The referendum result back in 2016 was not what I wanted – personally or professionally. But as a business leader with international as well as national interests, I felt it was imperative that we continued with ‘business as usual’. We have to carry on doing the best we can, showing the world that Britain is at the top of its game in architecture, regardless of the political environment we find ourselves in.
That being said, it has been a little hard to remain positive over the past few months while watching the negotiations for our EU exit. The continuing uncertainty has widespread negative effects that can’t be ignored or faced down with a ‘glass half full’ attitude. Not only is it forcing us towards an economic downturn as the property industry slows to assess the impact on investment, but it is also causing significant issues with recruitment and retention.
Britain’s architecture is globally sought after – people want to work for us and with us and commission work by us. If we become insular, that all goes away.
Numerous lobbying groups have repeatedly called for clarity and reassurance and pointed out the wide-ranging effects of attracting and retaining EU employees.
So while I appreciate the efforts of the PM to get a draft withdrawal deal on the table to make some kind of progress out of this quagmire, I am increasingly frustrated that this clarity is still to be found. I am grateful that I can confirm to my EU employees that should the deal be ratified, they will still have residency, but the future is as hazy as ever in terms of our rights to work overseas, and it’s not looking at all great for our future international recruitment.
Brexit comprises so many millions of decisions and balances, but surely high among the priorities should be retaining the country’s ability to be the best we can be. Within architecture that means being able to continue to attract talent. That is how we compete for projects; that is how we ensure that we stay at the top of the game; that is how we push our industry and in turn increase our contribution to the economy. Britain’s architecture is globally sought after – people want to work for us and with us and commission work by us. If we become insular, that all goes away.
And this isn’t a ‘what if’ scenario; it has already begun. The Architects’ Journal reported a drop in EU registrations of the Architects Registration Board by 42%, while recent Office for National Statistics figures show the largest-ever annual fall (132,000 over 3 months) of EU nationals in the UK workforce since records began in 1990s.
Even outside of the EU situation, the pay threshold for skilled worker visa applications is going up and up, and a Tier 2 Visa is becoming increasingly difficult to secure anyway. There is speculation that this is a result of spaces being prioritised for the NHS as it is no longer attracting EU doctors and nurses… because of Brexit. So there is added uncertainty for those who have less than the required quantity of service to apply for indefinite leave to remain or become a resident. This is having a real and tangible effect on Make, and I know we know we are not alone in this.
Of course, clients too are facing uncertainty of when, how and where to invest. As one international developer said to me recently: “You guys can argue among yourselves about the future of your country as much as you like. In the meantime, we’ll take our money elsewhere.”
If this carries on, I might need to drink my ‘glass half full’.
A version of this article first appeared in the December 1st print edition of EG.