- Designing in the wake of coronavirus
- University tech
- Living employment
- Bridging the gap
- Stephen Wiltshire
- International Women’s Day 2020
- Inspiring Girls
- Post COVID-19 – What’s next for higher education design?
- Four ways residential design might change after COVID-19
- One Make
- Atlas – Tech City statement
- Architectural Drawing: States of Becoming
- Bringing the brand back to life
- Interview with Sarah O’Hara
- The Architecture Drawing Prize exhibition reviewed
- Coal Drops Yard – creating a new retail destination
- Jack Sallabank interviews Ibrahim Ibrahim, Managing Director of Portland Design
- ‘Architecture in the frame’ – London Art Fair
- The future of retail and workplace
- A Hong Kong perspective on a post COVID-19 society
- Chadstone Link: Making new connections
- Design narratives and community bonds
- Behind the scenes at the 2019 World Architecture Festival
- Drawing on the culture that makes the buildings
- Future modelmakers 2020
- After coronavirus, how can we accelerate change in workplace design to improve connection and wellbeing?
- Ask the Makers
- Improving social ties in our cities
- Q&A with our student modelmakers: Theodore Polwarth
- Q&A with our student modelmakers: James Picot
- The Teaching and Learning Building model by James Picot
- The City is Yours
- Pablo Bronstein
- Campus and the City
- Encouraging spaces of conviviality
- The importance and passion of heritage in the built environment
- No show, so what next?
- The Madison model by Theodore Polwarth
- Choosing architectural modelmaking
- The Big Data Institute model by Finlay Whitfield
- Q&A with our student modelmakers: Finlay Whitfield
- Make Roundtable
- Exchange Issue No. 3 Education and Research – Foreword
- State of the market – Hong Kong
- World Heritage Day 2020
- Make models: Agora Budapest
- Knowledge Exchange and Social Connection
- Interview with Peter McGeorge
- Photo Essay
- Interview with Julian Robinson
- Interview with Siu-Man Fung
- The university of the future
- Draw in order to see
- Our commitment to sustainable design
- Universities reshaping London
- Asta House – Local living in Fitzrovia
- Project delivery at 80 Charlotte Street
- Students speak
- The next generation of retail brands
- Interview with Dr Julie Wells
- Make models: The Link
- Langlands and Bell – Observing and Observed
- Telling Stories: The power of drawing to change our cities
- Interview with Stephen Talboys
- Wellbeing in the university landscape
- Wellbeing in the university landscape
- What role will hotels play in our society after COVID?
- Sketchbooks: draw like nobody’s watching
- Transparency and a sense of investment
- Honest, in-depth learning
- Interview with Argent’s Nick Searl
- Leaving a mark
- Interview with Chinachem’s Donald Choi
- The hand does not draw superfluous things
- Interview with Lendlease’s Natalie Slessor
- Make models: 20 Ropemaker Street, part 2
- The value of the drawing
- Museum for Architectural Drawing, Berlin
- Make manifesto
- Prized hand-drawings return a building to an organically conceived whole
- Interview with Brookfield Properties’ Stuart Harman
- Drawing details – technical and poetic
- Draw to Make
- Interview with Frasers Property Australia’s Joanna Russell
- Music and the workplace
- Living with loneliness
- Betts Project
- Wellbeing and the workplace
- Interview with Lendlease’s Kevin Chapman
- Interview with Brookfield Properties’ Peter Clarke
- An update from Sydney
- Combatting loneliness in the built environment
- Make models: 20 Ropemaker Street, part 3
- Sydney born and razed
- Make Roundtable
- Make models: 20 Ropemaker Street, part 1
- Interview with Vicinity Centres’ Rachele Godridge
- The smart workplace
- Architecture and Creativity
- Retail innovation beyond the shop door: Lessons from the USA (part 3)
- Retail innovation beyond the shop door: Lessons from the USA (part 2)
- Retail innovation beyond the shop door: Lessons from the USA (part 1)
- Connecting people and places
- Interview with General Projects’ Jacob Loftus
- Drawing to an end?
- High-density living in Hong Kong
- Make’s past, present and future
- The Architecture Drawing Prize – Not just another competition
- Community connections
- My time with the BCO
- The call of the wild
- Long live the office
- The art of an art historian
- Mary, queen of hotels
- Make models: Portsoken Pavilion
- The Make Charter
- Make models: LSQ London
- Disappearing Here – On perspective and other kinds of space
- Why Brexit will see a glass half-full emptied
- Drawing and thinking
- Make models: Grosvenor Waterside
- The Hollow Man: poetry of drawing
- Above and beyond
- Making shops exciting again: Lessons from the Nordics (part 1)
- Making shops exciting again: Lessons from the Nordics (part 2)
- Plein air in the digital age
- A “Plan in Impossible Perspective”
- Making shops exciting again: Lessons from the Nordics (part 3)
- The future of bespoke HQs
- World-class architecture
- Make models: The Luna
- Drawing architecture
- The future is bright but not the same
- Art Editor’s picks
- Employee ownership
- The tools of drawing
- Trecento re-enactment
- The Architecture Drawing Prize exhibition review
- Lessons on future office design from Asia Pacific
- The human office
- How drawing made architecture
- Advocating sustainable facade design
- Make models: FC Barcelona’s Nou Palau Blaugrana
- Drawing as an architect’s tool
- Are you VReady?
- Cycle design for the workplace
- The Architecture Drawing Prize
- Make models: an urban rail station
- Reporting from Berlin
- City-making and Sadiq
- Hand-drawing, the digital (and the archive)
- Ken Shuttleworth on drawing
- The green tiger
- Stefan Davidovici – green Mars architect
- When drawing becomes architecture
- Make models: Swindon Museum and Art Gallery
- The role of the concept sketch
- Make calls for a cultural shift in industry’s approach to fire safety
- 2036: A floor space odyssey
- Harold on tour
- London refocused
- Hotels by Make
- Full court press
- Digital Danube
- Don’t take a pop at POPS
- The future of architecture – Matthew Bugg
- The future of architecture – Jet Chu
- The future of architecture – Robert Lunn
- The future of architecture – David Patterson
- The future of architecture – Rebecca Woffenden
- The future of architecture – Katy Ghahremani
- Safer streets for all
- The importance of post-occupancy evaluation for our future built environment
- Put a lid on it
- Designing for a liveable city
- The future of architecture – Bill Webb
- Bricks – not just for house builders
- Designing in the City of Westminster
- Rolled gold
- How to make a fine suit
- Responsible sourcing starts with design
- Is off-site manufacture the answer?
- Developing a design for the facade of 7-10 Hanover Square
- Curious Sir Christopher Wren
- Responsible resourcing should be an integral part of every project
- The socio-economic value of people-focused cities
Draw to Make
Simon Lincoln is a partner overseeing Make’s Sydney studio. Simon established the Sydney studio in 2014 and is also leading the design and delivery of Wynyard Place, our first project in Australia. Simon has been at Make since 2005 and worked across the practice’s international portfolio in London, China and the UAE.
Here Simon discusses the role of architectural drawing in his day-to-day job at Make and why he expects to see a “renaissance” in hand drawing soon.
How would you describe your relationship with architectural drawing?
As architects, it would be very difficult to perform our role without the need to draw, whether it’s using CAD, hand sketching or another form. It’s engrained in our profession and our daily working life – it’s inseparable from what we do and how we communicate.
Drawing gives me time to think freely, to explore and resolve challenges of differing complexity.
How often does drawing feature in your workload at Make?
Daily. The typical drawings I produce are quick hand sketches to communicate an idea or solution for other team members, clients or consultants.
Do you have a preference for form (ie, manual drawings versus digitally produced renderings)? Do think these differ in their ability to convey ideas or authenticity?
I don’t have a preference; I think all media can be applied appropriately to the task in hand.
Nearly everyone understands a 3D render, and most understand diagrams. However, few understand 2D plans. Therefore, there tends to be a heavy reliance upon photorealistic renders, which I completely appreciate. The 3D render is often undeniable and well curated, which has its pros and cons.
Now the industry is moving more into the realm of VR and AR. At Make we’re working on several projects using VR, which is very exciting!
Do you think certain types of drawings are better suited for particular types of schemes?
It would be difficult to classify a style or type of drawing for a particular building/project. There is a tool for every job and every stage.
What tools do you gravitate towards when creating a drawing?
I tend to use pen and paper initially, and then I gain some reassurance in CAD/3D.
Do you think architects starting out today have a different relationship to drawing than those a decade or two older than them?
Almost every graduate I interview can produce 3D renders, which is great for us. Not many offer hand drawings in the portfolio. I think we’ll see a renaissance in hand drawing in the coming years. Hopefully this is fuelled by The Architecture Drawing Prize!
In my opinion an individual who draws/sketches has an appeal over students who don’t.
Does the culture around architectural drawing vary across the different countries you’ve worked in?
Our profession is international, and the way we communicate reflects this. There are small differences in the output of the drawings we produce, but the art and culture of drawing remain consistent. Clear communication, legibility and accuracy are required without geographical boundaries.
This Q&A forms part of our series on The Architecture Drawing Prize: an open drawing competition curated by Make, WAF and Sir John Soane’s Museum to highlight the importance of drawing in architecture.